<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Cryptography on Eclectic Stacks</title>
    <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/tags/cryptography/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cryptography on Eclectic Stacks</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.161.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.eclecticstacks.com/tags/cryptography/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The lost delights and challenges of type-in programs</title>
      <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/type-in-programs/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/type-in-programs/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I was reminded of the delights and challenges of type-in programs from decades past - listings printed in books and magazines for the reader to type in at home - which I suppose could be considered an ultra-low-bandwidth, high-error-rate method of software transmission via the printed page, eyeballs, and fingers - by this tweet about old computer magazines: &lt;a href=&#34;https://twitter.com/cyb3rops/status/1476122483308875778&#34;&gt;https://twitter.com/cyb3rops/status/1476122483308875778&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
