<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Plays on Eclectic Stacks</title>
    <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/tags/plays/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Plays on Eclectic Stacks</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.161.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 10:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.eclecticstacks.com/tags/plays/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Not X But Y - a warning from the past</title>
      <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/not-x-but-y-warning-from-past-intuition-pumps/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/not-x-but-y-warning-from-past-intuition-pumps/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I was revisiting &lt;em&gt;Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking&lt;/em&gt; (2013) by philosopher Daniel C. Dennett - and was interested see that years before constructions like &amp;ldquo;Not X, but Y&amp;rdquo; became an indicator of AI writing, he was warning that they could also be a sign of a writer attempting a logical sleight of hand&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constellations - plays branching and switching - and fragmentary Tolkien</title>
      <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/constellations-branching-and-switching-plays/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/constellations-branching-and-switching-plays/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;d heard great things about, but never got to see, Nick Payne&amp;rsquo;s two-hander play &amp;ldquo;Constellations&amp;rdquo; featuring a cosmologist, a bee-keeper, and branching scenes to show the many alternative ways their story could have gone. (The Guardian explains more in its &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2012/jan/20/constellations-review&#34;&gt;review of the original production&lt;/a&gt;.) So I was excited to see it appear for &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.ntathome.com/constellations&#34;&gt;streaming on &lt;em&gt;National Theatre at Home&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, with Anna Maxwell Martin and Chris O&amp;rsquo;Dowd&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tom Stoppard riddle</title>
      <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/tom-stoppard-riddle/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/tom-stoppard-riddle/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As my mind wandered while assembling some flat-pack furniture, I was (perhaps inordinately) pleased with myself for coming up with a riddle about one of my favourite playwrights.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tom Stoppard riddle - with answer</title>
      <link>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/tom-stoppard-riddle-with-answer/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.eclecticstacks.com/post/tom-stoppard-riddle-with-answer/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As my mind wandered while assembling some flat-pack furniture, I was (perhaps inordinately) pleased with myself for coming up with a riddle about one of my favourite playwrights.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
